Skip to Main Content

AGLC Guide: Repeated Citations

Your one-stop-shop for all your AGLC needs.

Rule

See the full details and examples in rule 1.4 of the AGLC4, page 9. 

  • Use ibid if referencing the same citation as the preceding footnote.  
  • Use n[footnote number] to refer to an earlier citation in a footnote that isn't directly above. 

Ibid

Full details are provided in rule 1.4.2 of the AGLC4, page 11. 

  • Ibid is used in the immediately preceding footnote to indicate it is the same citation as the preceding footnote. 
  • Ibid should be capitalised if it is at the start of the footnote. 
  • Don't use ibid if there are multiple citations in the preceding footnote. 

Example in the footnotes:

In this case, the High Court was found to have the power to set aside a jury verdict.This can be done where there has been a miscarriage of justice, including where it is unsafe or dangerous for the verdict to remain.

_____________________

Chamberlain v The Queen (No 2) (1984) 153 CLR 521 ('Chamberlain'). 

Ibid.

n [footnote number]

Full details are provided in rule 1.4.1 of the AGLC4, page 9.

  • If a source has already been cited, a shortened version of the citation can be used with a cross-reference to the full citation. 
  • This is easier to do when you have completed your assignment and all citations are in their final place.

(a) Format for a secondary source (book/journal):

  • Author Surname (n footnote number)

(b) Format for a primary source (case/legislation):

  • Short Title (n Footnote Number)

Note: you can add a pinpoint number at the end. See the AGLC4 for examples.

Example in the footnotes:

In this case, the High Court was found to have the power to set aside a jury verdict.This can be done where there has been a miscarriage of justice, including where it is unsafe or dangerous for the verdict to remain.In some instances, the media can create an adverse pre-trial environment which can affect jury trials, so continuing scrutiny of jury trials is needed by the court.3 In the end, the verdict was overturned.4 

_____________________

Chamberlain v The Queen (No 2) (1984) 153 CLR 521 ('Chamberlain'). 

Ibid.

Andrew Kirkham, 'R v Chamberlain: A Retrospective' (2020) 168 Victorian Bar News 29, 34.

Chamberlain (n 1). 

Charles Darwin University acknowledges the traditional custodians across the lands on which we live and work, and we pay our respects to Elders both past and present.
CRICOS Provider No: 00300K (NT/VIC) 03286A (NSW) RTO Provider No: 0373 Privacy StatementCopyright and DisclaimerFeedback • ABN 54 093 513 649